Like the Monty Python skit, net neutrality lives on. It's not the law. But it survives in lawsuits.
Net neutrality will (once again) have its day in court: This time, on Feb. 1, when Mozilla v. FCC is scheduled for the D.C. Circuit Court docket.
On that date, multiple players will line up on each side of the net-neutrality divide in front of a three-judge panel. In Case No. 18-1051, plaintiff Mozilla lines up against the Federal Communications Commission to argue for a return to the 2015 net neutrality regime enacted under former FCC Chair Tom Wheeler via Title II of the "Open Internet Order." Defendant FCC wants its 2017 "Restoring Internet Freedom" to stay on the books.
In reality, whether Mozilla wins or loses its case, the battle over net neutrality most likely will continue.
When FCC Chair Ajit Pai began discussing the move to implent his "Restoring Internet Freedom" order, one main reason was ISPs' decrease in broadband infrastructure spending -- an argument unproven, according to many industry experts.
Advocates on both sides of the Mozilla v. FCC lawsuit include heavy hitters. The FCC is supported by intervenors including NCTA - The Internet & Television Association, CTIA - the Wireless Association and USTelecom. For its part, petitioner Mozilla has intervenors such as National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, American Cable Association, Internet Association, Computer & Communications Industry Association, National Association of State Utility Consumer Advocates, City and County of San Francisco, Writers Guild of America, West, Entertainment Software Association, Wireless Internet Service Providers Association and Digital Justice Foundation.
The loser of the D.C. Circuit decision most likely will try to bring the case to the US Supreme Court.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh may recuse himself from any such case, given his role in the D.C. Circuit Court decision during the Obama era.
Given the timing of court hearings, this (and other) net neutrality cases could reach decision-making at around the same time as the 2020 presidential election.
Should US voters elect a Democrat president in 2020, that does not automatically mean the FCC will change. It's an independent commission, supposedly run free of White House politics. Commissioners have set terms but can leave at any time and may stay on for up to a year or so after their term ends should they desire (and if a replacement is not eagerly awaiting).Recent history suggests, however, it's typically sympathetic to whoever's in charge of the country.
When former President Barack Obama suggested net neutrality was important, Wheeler concurred and acted -- despite much hand-wringing and angst from their Republican adversaries, including Pai. Once in authority, Pai was quick to change the FCC's stance.
No doubt, if the president's party changes in 2020, the status of net neutrality could once again change. And more lawsuits will clutter the D.C. Circuit Court, leading potentially to SCOTUS.
The lack of an accurate broadband map means states and counties are tackling this issue themselves – and sometimes finding big disparities in the data – before spending their residents' money on deploying infrastructure.
Years of investment in infrastructure and user-friendly tools make the difference in how operators act before and after natural disasters, even though Hurricane Dorian's impact on Florida was far less than originally forecast (thankfully).
The number and power of Britain's so-called altnets is growing, increasing access to fiber-based gigabit broadband for residents and businesses where incumbents such as BT, Virgin and Openreach did not deliver.
It wasn't long ago that TV was ranked by subscribers as the most important service in the bundle provided by their communications service provider (CSP). Recent research indicates that for nearly three quarters of subscribers, broadband is now the most important service. Broadcast TV is the most important service to only 15% of North American consumers, replaced by OTT video streaming platforms like Netflix, Amazon Prime and Disney+. In addition, many different competitors are moving aggressively to stake a claim in consumers' homes.
In 2020, CSPs need to fight back by transforming their business models, which are becoming more reliant on a single source of revenue: fixed broadband services.
This webinar will focus on helping CSPs transform their business models by placing a firm focus on delivering a sensational subscriber experience and by offering compelling new services that generate value for subscribers. These actions will reinforce the CSP's strategic position in the home network and position themselves for growth in the next decade.
Key topics include:
Being the first to market with WiFi 6 technology, in response to consumer purchases of new devices over the holidays;
Having the insights needed to proactively resolve issues, often before your subscribers even know that there are issues;
Providing help desk agents with the visibility they need to resolve common subscriber issues more quickly;
Delivering a mobile app, in response to consumer demands for the ability to do some things themselves, rather than having to call technical support; and
Addressing consumer concerns around device security, privacy and control with enhanced security and parental controls.
In this insightful Light Reading radio show, Kurt Raaflaub, Head of Strategic Solutions Marketing, will outline the key service provider challenges, deployment considerations, next-gen Gigabit technologies, and service models to win market share in the rapidly growing MDU market.