Contributors   |   Messages   |   Polls   |   Resources   |   Register for newsletter
Comments
Newest First | Oldest First | Threaded View
glennfish
glennfish
1/8/2020 6:23:20 PM
User Rank
Narrowbander
Re: question on under reporting
Regarding your question about under reporting...

The FCC database has over 2,000 ISPs with data.  We think the actual number is closer to 3,000 based on crowd sourced ASNS in rural areas.


 We did a preliminary look at the level of effort required to determine under reporting by sampling some rural ISPs and determined that under reporting is primarily a phenomenon of fixed wireless providers and small regional ISPs (Cable & Fiber).

We believe, but do not know, that about 5% of the wireless ISPs never report to the FCC.  These tend to be ma/pa type enterprises with a few hundred customers each.

We believe, but do not know, that about 50% of the remaining wireless ISPs under report simply because they don't know their coverage areas until a field tech approves an install, and it never works back to the FCC as a served location.

For small non-wireless ISPs, we believe, but do not know, that for FTTP ISPs that have less than 10,000 customers, less than half of their coverage areas are reported to the FCC.  These tend to be small shops who are more involved in deployment than reporting.

It's a good research topic for sure.  :)

50%
50%
Alison D
Alison D
1/8/2020 5:50:31 PM
User Rank
Narrowbander
Re: Reliance on ISP sourcing & the challenge process
Thanks for this insightful response, Glenn. When you walked me through your organization's broadband map last year, it was fascinating to see the detailed display of infrastructure -- fiber, DSL, satellite etc. -- come to life (or not) around the country. When compared with the census-block-generated data, it was even more interesting, to put it politely. With states and counties (and perhaps municipalities) now apparently requiring more complete data about their existing and non-existent infrastructure before they hand out grants or loans, I imagine there'll be more of a call for services from the companies, organizations, universities and agencies already able to provide a more complete picture. 

Interesting point, out of many you made, about under-reporting... wonder how widespread that is? And whether it's out of disinterest or understaffing, or whether there's a real or perceived business reason?

50%
50%
glennfish
glennfish
1/8/2020 5:04:33 PM
User Rank
Narrowbander
Reliance on ISP sourcing & the challenge process
While any measures to improve on the FCC's broadband map are to be applauded, the single most egregious error is to rely on ISP generated data to indicate where broadband is, and is not.

Several examples, irrespective of the more recent efforts in Virginia, Georgia, and Kansas (not mentioned in the article)...

1.  ISPs routinely mis-report.  Even with a challenge process, the fact that a challenge is required, means the process is broken.  Most citizens would be unable or unwilling to challenge ISP provided data.  By example, I live in Le Seuer County, Minnesota.  There are 1,995 block groups in the county.  One particular ISP has reported to the FCC that they have 1 GIG FTTP in 1,478 of these block groups.  This particular ISP is a fixed wireless provider and actually covers a small number of block groups (< 100) with a fixed wireless solution of less than 6 meg down.  The protest process would require residents of 1,478 block groups to challenge this particular ISP's reported coverage.  This is one county of 3,007 in the U.S.  To rely on ISP self reporting and a challenge process is simply not going to work.

2.  ISPs routinely do not report meaningful data.  In the public 2018 release of the FCC 477 data, over 10% of the coverage reports showed ISPs reporting download speeds and upload speeds of ZERO for both residential and businesses.  After that data was scrubbed, nearly 1/4 of the remaining records reported residential download speeds of ZERO.

3.  Not every ISP reports to the FCC.  We have numerous cases where we can show that ISPs are present in an area and have never bothered to inform the FCC through the 477 process.  While over-reporting is routinely claimed, under reporting also happens.

4.  Reporting of coverage by an ISP by a type of technology does not indicate the actual consumer throughput at any point.  For fixed wireless, long range connections may not have anything close to the channel capacity claimed by the ISP.  For fiber connections, insufficient backhaul, aged equipment, may dramatically reduce the throughput well below the "rated" capacity.

With these examples, I suggest that ISP self reporting is a proven means of having unreliable data and guarantees that public money is being withheld from where it is needed, and allocated to where it is not.

The States which have undertaken their own initiatives are to be praised for their efforts, and cautioned by the lessons learned.

In my opinion the whole process should be reversed.  Citizens should be the original source of data, and the ISPs may challenge citizen data.  Crowd sourced data initiatives already exist and albeit limited in scope to date, work quite well.

 

100%
0%


Latest Articles
Instead of staging our usual in-person conference in Denver, we will now conduct a free, digital event over two full days in late August.
New bill arrives as FCC Chairman's voluntary connectivity pledge with ISPs reaches its expiration date.
Cable operator has accelerated the rollout of an AI-powered system called 'Octave' to improve the efficiency of its access network.
Like Comcast and AT&T, Cox's business services unit has tailored its commercial offerings to suit customers that have been forced to support a growing remote workforce during the pandemic.
Overall peak usage on US cable networks continues to flatten out and even decline slightly, but sustained higher levels of usage on the upstream path have persisted, according to the latest data from the NCTA.
Sponsored Video
Ronan Kelly, ADTRAN CTO, EMEA & APAC, shares his thoughts on the regulatory and government policy, technology adoption and consumer services ...
Ronan Kelly, ADTRAN CTO, EMEA & APC, shares his thoughts on industry operators leveraging virtualization, disaggregation and open SDN control, ...
Network slicing promises to be a panacea, but the biggest hurdles are not technological. The grand ambition of enabling intelligent, adaptive, ...
F-Secure has been providing security for endpoints for 30 years, and using AI and machine learning algorithms, for example in the labs to automate ...
Fahri Diner, CEO and Co-founder of Plume, unveiled a new open source initiative, OpenSync, at Broadband World Forum 2018. Announced together with ...
All Videos
Information Resources
All resources
Video
The US government has moved to block Huawei's access, not only to US technology but to any technology made with US expertise. Light Reading's Iain ...
OBS CEO Helmut Reisinger and SVP of Customer Services and Operations Aliette Mousnier Lompre discuss keeping customers connected and adapting ...
The lines are blurring between streaming media and pay-TV devices and CSPs need to figure out how to manage that change, says Omdia analyst Paul ...
Omdia's principal research analyst, John Kendall, discusses whole home solutions and the importance of WiFi strategies to communications service ...
Ahead of Mobile World Congress, Omdia's principal research analyst, John Kendall, talks about developments in the broadband CPE market as WiFi 6.0 ...
All Videos
Webinars
ARCHIVED
Tuesday, March 24, 2020
11:00 a.m. New York / 3:00 p.m London

Over the next two years, approximately 60% of service providers (both large and small) will adopt virtualization on a wide scale across their networks, according to the latest survey report from Ovum. Why are providers making these moves? Is there an easy way to start?

Learn how and why service providers are using virtualization to transform their networks. This webinar will look at how providers are leveraging virtualization to create more flexible and agile networks while also providing a better customer experience. Expert speakers from netElastic and Heavy Reading will address the industry drivers for network virtualization, the benefits that can be realized, the challenges to face and the results of virtualization being achieved by providers today.

Key topics will include:

  • Current network infrastructure and the move to virtualization
  • Benefits and challenges of network virtualization
  • How providers can get started
  • Service provider success stories: the decision to virtualize, the solution, and results

Partner Perspectives - from our sponsors
The 'Agile Titan' – an Advanced Supplier Model to Meet the Needs of 21st Century Networks
By Josh Hirschey, General Manager, Amphenol Broadband Solutions and Mette Brink, General Manager, Amphenol Procom & Amphenol Antenna Solutions EMEA & APAC
What Service Providers Should Know About WiFi 6
By Greg Owens, Senior Director, Product Marketing, Calix
All Partner Perspectives
Broadband World Forum Perspectives
As the Senior Digital Experience Strategist at Canadian operator Rogers Communications, Lindsey Omelon build on her years of marketing experience to approach her strategy with a hybrid ...
There's certainly no shortage of hype around the use of AI in the telecoms sector, but fewer instances of real-world deployments. South Korean national operator KT is one of those ...
Do a Google search of 'artificial intelligence broadband' and you'll get more than 9 million results in less than a second: The sheer volume of content out there shouldn't surprise anyone ...
Comcast, like any other major communications service provider, is undergoing significant changes in the way it grows its business, how it runs its business and the technologies it uses to ...
Five years ago, NOS board member Manuel Ramalho Eanes banked big on smart homes and smart cities.
All Broadband World Forum Perspectives
Broadband World News
About Us     Advertise With Us     Contact Us     Help     Register     Twitter     Facebook     RSS
Copyright © 2020 Light Reading, part of Informa Tech,
a division of Informa PLC. Privacy Policy | Cookie Policy | Terms of Use
in partnership with