Broadband consumers can pay up to 45% more than the rate cable and telecom operators advertise for their services, according to research released today by GlobalData.
The rates prospective subscribers see flashed on TV commercials, websites and print ads generally do not include the cost of necessary equipment -- such as a router or set-top box, as well as mandatory service or technology fees.
Rather than cost transparency, an attractively-priced bundle can see its monthly fee increase dramatically, said Courtney Rudd, senior consumer services analyst at GlobalData, in a statement. "For example, Xfinity's $40 'Starter Internet plus Basic' TV bundle jumps to $58 per month once the additional $18 in equipment costs are added. Prices can also vary based on location."
In August 2019, Verizon had the highest add-on costs at $24 per month; Frontier and Altice USA's Optimum followed, with about $17 to $18 in extra equipment fees, the researcher found. However, both AT&T and Google Fiber were more transparent to subscribers: They did not tack on additional equipment or technology fees to the advertised bundle price, GlobalData said. Hidden fees can include early termination fees, set-up and activation fees as well as unexpected contract lengths, wrote BroadbandNow, which tracks operators' prices from around the US.
"The lack of pricing transparency in the US market is an ongoing inconvenience for customers and an open invitation for disruptor aggression," Rudd said.
These findings support an April study that found 48% of Americans have access to wired broadband at $60 per month or less. In its "The State of Broadband in America, Q2 2019" report, BroadbandNow determined less than 5% of consumers in states such as Colorado, Vermont and New Hampshire could connect at 25 Mbit/s or faster for $60 per month, unless it was a promotional rate.
Many Tier 1 MSOs have yet to choose between EPON and GPON, and their natural ties to IEEE standard-based technologies plus EPON's accelerated future timeline, could make this an attractive standard for large cable ops, ADTRAN engineering exec Jess Beihoffer tells BBWN.
The federal watchdog agency recommends the FCC consider eliminating the old cost-accounting program since it's more prone to fraud than the alternative reimbursement method among small, rural providers that receive about $2.5 billion annually to deploy broadband.
The strength of natural disasters like hurricanes is worsening, scientists say, and it's imperative that broadband infrastructures can withstand or be speedily repaired post-catastrophe, writes Fiber Broadband Association President and CEO Lisa Youngers.
After suffering many quarters of financial and broadband subscriber losses, Frontier Communications' bond owners are ready for dramatic change – including a replacement for CEO Dan McCarthy (pictured), Bloomberg reports today, citing several sources.
The ongoing debate around GPON vs EPON can get as heated as discussions around politics and religion, but both technologies offer some advantages over the other depending on the needs your network is servicing.
In this webinar, we will focus on the facts around the GPON vs EPON debate and how that technological decision is almost always made based on factors outside the technology itself.
In this insightful Light Reading radio show, Kurt Raaflaub, Head of Strategic Solutions Marketing, will outline the key service provider challenges, deployment considerations, next-gen Gigabit technologies, and service models to win market share in the rapidly growing MDU market.